AI & ML interests

AGI and ML Pipelines, Ambient IoT AI, Behavior Cognitive and Memory AI, Clinical Medical and Nursing AI, Genomics AI, GAN Gaming GAIL AR VR XR and Simulation AI, Graph Ontology KR KE AI, Languages and NLP AI, Quantum Compute GPU TPU NPU AI, Vision Image Document AI

dronefreakΒ 
posted an update about 1 month ago
view post
Post
401
πŸŒ§οΈβ„οΈ Free demo: remove rain, raindrops, or snow from a photo with a single model

I put together an unofficial demo for **Histoformer** (ECCV 2024, arXiv: 2407.10172), a 16.6M-parameter transformer that handles three different weather degradations, rain streaks, adherent raindrops, and snow, in one unified model. It uses a "histogram self-attention" mechanism that groups pixels by degradation intensity instead of spatial position, which is a
neat way to sidestep the usual spatial-window tradeoffs in restoration transformers.

Try it here, free on ZeroGPU: dronefreak/histoformer-weather-restoration

Upload a photo and get a before/after slider. Two checkpoints available: one tuned for real-world photos, one for the paper's synthetic benchmarks.

Also put together a cleaner, easy-to-use model card with a copy-pasteable Quickstart if you'd rather run it yourself: dronefreak/Histoformer

This is an unofficial demo/mirror, not affiliated with the original authors. All credit for the actual research goes to Shangquan Sun, Wenqi Ren, Xinwei Gao, Rui Wang, and Xiaochun Cao (@sunsean ). Official repo: https://github.com/sunshangquan/Histoformer. Weights are MIT-licensed.

Reported numbers from the paper: 32.1 PSNR on rain+fog (Outdoor-Rain), 33.1 on raindrops, 37.4 / 32.2 on light/heavy snow (Snow100K-S/L).
  • 2 replies
Β·
dronefreakΒ 
posted an update about 1 month ago
view post
Post
2132
πŸš€ Excited to open-source the SeaDronesSee Object Detection Model Zoo on Hugging Face.

This release includes:

- πŸ€– YOLOv8, YOLOv11, YOLOv26 and RF-DETR object detection models trained on SeaDronesSee, spanning nano through x-large YOLO variants plus RF-DETR Nano/Small/Medium.
- 🌊 Benchmarked on SeaDronesSee's maritime search-and-rescue setting β€” swimmers, boats, jet skis, life-saving appliances and buoys captured by UAVs over open water, at varying altitudes and non-uniform image resolutions (1080p up to 4K+).
- πŸ“Š Detailed model cards with mAP/precision/recall, per-class breakdowns, PR/F1 curves and confusion matrices (YOLO), qualitative detection showcases, and full training configurations for reproducibility.

Headline numbers:
- πŸ† Best mAP@50: 83.47% (RF-DETR Medium), 47.49% mAP@50:95, 87.01% precision.
- ⚑ Best efficiency tradeoff: YOLOv26s hits 80.14% mAP@50 at just 22.8 GFLOPs (10.0M params) β€” within ~3 points of the top RF-DETR variant, while actually beating YOLOv11x's 74.82% mAP@50 using ~8.6x fewer FLOPs (196.0 GFLOPs).

The goal is to make benchmarking and experimenting with maritime UAV perception easier by providing ready-to-use pretrained checkpoints, all trained and evaluated under one shared pipeline (DetectionBench: https://github.com/dronefreak/DetectionBench).

Full credit for the underlying dataset goes to Leon Amadeus Varga, Benjamin Kiefer, Martin Messmer, and Andreas Zell (University of TΓΌbingen, WACV 2022) β€” this release is an unofficial, YOLO-ready reformatting of their work (CC0-licensed), not a new dataset.

If you're working on maritime search-and-rescue, UAV perception, autonomous drones, or real-time object detection, I hope these resources are useful.

πŸ“¦ Dataset:
dronefreak/SeaDronesSee

πŸ€– Model Collection: dronefreak/seadronessee-object-detection-model-zoo-6a7b030a25797e5dd2d70123

Feedback, bug reports, and contributions are always welcome.
  • 2 replies
Β·
dronefreakΒ 
posted an update about 1 month ago
view post
Post
1909
πŸš€ Excited to open-source the GWHD Wheat Head Detection Model Zoo on Hugging Face.

This release includes:

- πŸ€– YOLOv8, YOLOv11, YOLOv26 and RF-DETR object detection models trained on GWHD (Global Wheat Head Dataset), spanning nano through x-large variants across both architecture families.
- 🌾 Benchmarked on GWHD's dense, single-class wheat-head detection task β€” ~45 annotated heads per image on average, captured across multiple countries, genotypes, and growth stages, a genuinely hard small/dense-object setting.
- πŸ“Š Detailed model cards with mAP/precision/recall, per-class breakdowns, PR/F1 curves and confusion matrices (YOLO), qualitative detection showcases, and full training configurations for reproducibility.

Headline numbers:
- πŸ† Best mAP@50: 74.25% (YOLOv11x), 34.92% mAP@50:95, 83.37% precision.
- ⚑ Best efficiency tradeoff: YOLOv26s hits 70.49% mAP@50 at just 22.8 GFLOPs (10.0M params) β€” within ~4 points of the top YOewer FLOPs (196.0 GFLOPs).

The goal is to make benchmarking and experimenting with agricultural computer vision easier by providing ready-to-use pretrained checkpoints, all trained and evaluated under one shared pipeline (DetectionBench: https://github.com/dronefreak/DetectionBench).
Full credit for the underlying dataset goes to Etienne David, Mario Serouart, Simon Madec, and the Global Wheat Head Detection 2020/2021) β€” this release is anunofficial, YOLO-ready reformatting of their work, not a new dataset.

If you're working on precision at detection, or just want areproducible detector benchmark, I hope these resources are useful.

πŸ“¦ Dataset:
dronefreak/GWHD

πŸ€– Model Collection: https://huggingface.co/collections/dronefreak/gwhd-wheat-head-detection-model-zoo-6a7aea28b5431918cc46cec1

Feedback, bug reports, and contributions are always welcome.
  • 3 replies
Β·
dronefreakΒ 
posted an update about 2 months ago
view post
Post
931
πŸš€ Excited to open-source the VDD Semantic Segmentation Model Zoo on Hugging Face.

This release includes:

- πŸ€– CABiNet and YOLO26 semantic segmentation models trained on VDD (Varied Drone Dataset), spanning Nano through XLarge YOLO26 variants plus a CABiNet (MobileNetV3-Large) baseline.
- 🌍 Benchmarked on VDD's varied altitudes, viewpoints, and scenes (urban, rural, natural) β€” a more diverse and challenging setting than single-flight UAV footage.
- πŸ“Š Detailed model cards with evaluation metrics, per-class IoU, confusion matrices, qualitative RGB / Ground-Truth / Prediction comparisons, and training configurations for reproducibility.

Headline numbers:
- πŸ† Best mIoU: 78.83% (YOLO26x-sem)
- ⚑ Best efficiency tradeoff: CABiNet-Large hits 77.76% mIoU at just 54.8 GFLOPs β€” within 1-2 points of the top YOLO26 variantO26x's 430.9 GFLOPs)

The goal is to make benchmarking and experimenting with aerial semantic segmentation easier by providing ready-to-use pretraineat, all trained and evaluatedunder one shared pipeline.

If you're working on UAV perception, autonomous drones, robotics, remote sensing, or real-time semantic segmentation, I hope these resources are useful.

πŸ“¦ Dataset: RussRobin/VDD

πŸ€– Model Collection: https://huggingface.co/collections/dronefreak/vdd-semantic-segmentation-model-zoo

Feedback, bug reports, and contributions are always welcome.
dronefreakΒ 
posted an update 2 months ago
view post
Post
4557
πŸš€ Excited to open-source the **UAVid Semantic Segmentation Model Zoo** on Hugging Face.

This release includes:

* πŸ“¦ A **YOLO-compatible mirror** of the UAVid semantic segmentation dataset, preserving the original train/val/test splits while reorganizing the directory structure for plug-and-play use with modern training pipelines.
* πŸ€– Multiple **YOLO26 semantic segmentation models** trained on UAVid, spanning Nano through Medium variants.
* πŸ“Š Detailed model cards with evaluation metrics, per-class IoU, confusion matrices, qualitative results, and training configurations for reproducibility.

The goal is to make benchmarking and experimenting with aerial semantic segmentation easier by providing ready-to-use datasets and pretrained models in a consistent format.

If you're working on UAV perception, autonomous drones, robotics, remote sensing, or real-time semantic segmentation, I hope these resources are useful.

**πŸ“¦ Dataset:** dronefreak/UAVid-2020

**πŸ€– Model Collection:** https://huggingface.co/collections/dronefreak/uavid-semantic-segmentation-model-zoo

Feedback, bug reports, and contributions are always welcome.
dronefreakΒ 
posted an update 3 months ago
view post
Post
3339
Excited to open-source the VisDrone Aerial Object Detection Model Zoo on Hugging Face.

The collection includes multiple YOLO variants trained and evaluated on the VisDrone benchmark for aerial object detection, with accompanying documentation and performance metrics.

If you're working on drones, aerial surveillance, robotics, or small-object detection, I hope these models save you some time.

Model Zoo: https://huggingface.co/collections/dronefreak/visdrone-detection-model-zoo

Feedback, issues, and contributions are welcome.
  • 13 replies
Β·
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 5 months ago
view post
Post
190
![Feather DB LongMemEval Results]( Hawky-ai/longmemeval-results)

We ran Feather DB v0.8.0 on LongMemEval (ICLR 2025) β€” 500 questions across real multi-session conversations, up to 115K tokens each.

**Score: 0.693** Β· GPT-4o full-context baseline: 0.640
Full 500-question run with Gemini-Flash: **$2.40**

Per-axis breakdown:
β†’ Info-extraction: **0.942**
β†’ Knowledge-update: **0.714**
β†’ Multi-session: **0.606**
β†’ Temporal: **0.477** ← the hard one, Phase 9 addresses this

Architecture: Hybrid BM25+dense Β· adaptive temporal decay Β· embedded (no server) Β· p50 = 0.19ms Β· MIT

pip install feather-db

Raw results + audit JSONs: Hawky-ai/longmemeval-results
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 8 months ago
view post
Post
1474
Just released a new dataset designed for training reasoning models on Meta (Facebook/Instagram) advertising fatigue detection!

What is it? A GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) training dataset with 200+ carefully crafted scenarios covering:

πŸ” Fatigue Signal Detection: CTR drops, CPM spikes, frequency analysis
🩺 Performance Diagnosis: Root cause analysis frameworks
πŸ“‹ Strategy: Creative refresh cadence, testing frameworks
πŸ“Š Analysis: ROI calculations, metric interpretation
Why GRPO? GRPO training helps models learn structured reasoning. Each response follows the <thinking> and <answer> format.

Check it out here: Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/meta-fatigue-grpo-dataset
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 8 months ago
view post
Post
251
πŸ™οΈ Hugging Face Community Post
Title: 🧬 Experimenting with "Dynamic Chaos" in Tamil SLMs

Hi everyone! I just published a new experimental study on Small Language Model (SLM) resilience.

I took the Qwen2.5-0.5B model and put it through a "Chaos Phase" to see how much weight data a tiny model can lose before its understanding of classical Tamil grammar breaks.

Key highlights of the study:

Target Data: Fine-tuned on the Thirukkural (1,330 couplets + modern explanations).
The Chaos Step: Applied 20% random weight pruning but implemented "Layer Protection" for the Token Embeddings and LM Head to keep the characters readable.
Compression: 4-bit (Q4_K_M) quantization for extreme efficiency.
Result: A surrealist classical Tamil model that is ultra-light (~300MB) and ultra-fast!

Check out the model and the experiment logic here: Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/qwen-tamil-chaos-v1
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 8 months ago
view post
Post
337
Performance Marketing meets "Thinking Mode" 🧠

I’m excited to release hawky-ai-Qwen3-0.6B-Marketing-MoT, a specialized SLM designed for deep strategic reasoning in performance marketing.

While small at 0.6B parameters, this model punches way above its weight class by utilizing a Mixture of Thoughts (MoT) framework. It doesn't just give you an answer; it thinks through the logic of Meta Ads scaling, GA4 attribution, and unit economics before providing a strategic recommendation.

Key Features:

Thinking-First: Trained on 1,500+ critical thinking scenarios.
MoT Framework: 5 distinct reasoning styles (Linear, Exploratory, Critical, Deconstructive, Analogical).
SLM Speed: Perfect for low-latency, high-precision marketing audits.
Check it out on Hugging Face: πŸ”— Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/hawky-ai-Qwen3-0.6B-Marketing-MoT
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 8 months ago
view post
Post
2215
Introducing Hawky-AI H1 4B PM: The First Open-Source LLM for Performance Marketing 🎯

Hey HF Community! πŸ‘‹

Just released the first LLM fine-tuned specifically for Performance Marketing.
What is it?
Gemma 3 4B distilled from Claude Opus 4.5 with expert-level marketing knowledge.
Covers:
πŸ“± Meta Ads (campaign structure, bidding, scaling, creative fatigue)
πŸ” Google Ads (Quality Score, Performance Max, lead gen)
πŸ“Š Measurement (ROAS vs MER, incrementality, LTV:CAC)
🎨 Creative Strategy (hook rates, A/B testing, funnel creative)
Why we built it:
Generic LLMs say "optimize your targeting" β€” not helpful. This model gives specific frameworks like "frequency at 4.5 + CTR drop = creative fatigue, here's the fix..."
Technical:

Base: Gemma 3 4B
Method: QLoRA (r=64)
Teacher: Claude Opus 4.5

πŸ”— Model: Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/hawky-ai-H1-4b-PM
Built by Hawky.ai

Try it and let us know what you think! πŸš€
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 9 months ago
view post
Post
1398
πŸ¦… Introducing Hawky AI H1 Mini 4B: A Domain-Specific Model for Performance Marketing

Hey HuggingFace community! πŸ‘‹

We're excited to share our first open-source release: **Hawky AI H1 Mini 4B Experimental** - a Gemma 3 4B model fine-tuned specifically for Meta advertising and performance marketing strategy.

🎯 Why We Built This

At [Hawky.ai](https://hawky.ai), we build AI-powered creative intelligence tools for performance marketers. We work with major agencies (WPP, Madison, GroupM) and brands (TVS Motors, Tanishq, Bajaj Finserv) on campaign optimization.

We wanted to explore: Can a small, domain-specific model provide expert-level guidance on performance marketing?

Specifically, we focused on Meta's Andromeda algorithm - the AI system that now powers ad delivery across Facebook and Instagram. Understanding Andromeda is crucial for modern media buying, but the knowledge is scattered and constantly evolving.

🧠 What Makes This Different

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
The model doesn't just answer - it **thinks through problems** step-by-step:

Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/hawky-ai-h1-mini-4b-experimental
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 9 months ago
view post
Post
951
Domain-specific reasoning is crucial when working with big-budget campaigns on Meta. That's why we've launched an experimental Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning model for critical thinking, tailored to Meta's Andromeda algorithm-based campaign structuring and optimization.

Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/hawky-ai-h1-mini-1b-experimental
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 9 months ago
view post
Post
2992
The recent update to Meta's ad algorithm is very difficult to crack, and even the latest models struggle to keep up with it. To address this, we've created a small experimental dataset for fine-tuning models to better tackle Meta's Andromeda algorithm: Sri-Vigneshwar-DJ/hawky-ai-andromeda-dataset
Sri-Vigneshwar-DJΒ 
posted an update 9 months ago
hesamationΒ 
posted an update 10 months ago
view post
Post
5806
this is big... 50 AI researchers from Bytedance, Alibaba, Tencent, and other labs/universities just published a 300-page paper with surprising lessons about coding models and agents (data, pre and post-training, etc).

key highlights:

> small LLMs can beat proprietary giants
RL (RLVR specifically) gives small open-source models an edge over big models in reasoning. a 14B model trained with RLVR on high-quality verified problems can match the performance of OpenAI's o3.

> models have a hard time learning Python.
mixing language models during pre-training is good, but Python behaves different from statically typed languages. languages with similar syntax (Java and C#, or JavaScript and TypeScript) creates high positive synergy. mixing Python heavily into the training of statically typed languages can actually hurt because of Python's dynamic typing.

> not all languages are equal (coding scaling laws)
the amount of data required to specialize a model on a language drastically depends on the language. paper argues like C# and Java are easier to learn (less training data required). languages like Python and Javascript are actually more tricky to learn, ironically (you see AI most used for these languages :)

> MoE vs Dense (ability vs stability)
MoE models offer higher capacity, but are much more fragile during SFT than dense models. hyperparams in training have a more drastic effect in MoE models, while dense models are more stable. MoE models also require constant learning rate schedules to avoid routing instability.

> code models are "insecure" by default (duh)
training on public repos makes models learn years of accumulated insecure coding patterns. safety fine-tuning often fails to work much on code. a model might refuse to write a hate speech email but will happily generate a SQL-injection vulnerable function because it "works."

read the full paper:
From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence (2511.18538)
  • 1 reply
Β·