Papers
arxiv:2610.38637

On-Policy Self-Distillation with Teacher Evolution

Published on Oct 28
· Submitted by
Shufan Shen
on Nov 3
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation improves on-policy self-distillation by continuously enhancing self-teaching reliability through reward-guided teacher optimization and adaptive down-weighting of unreliable samples.

On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), which aligns a student model's token-level distribution with that of its self-teacher prompted by privileged context, has emerged as a promising direction to mitigate reward sparsity in sequence-level post-training paradigms. However, OPSD often fails to achieve continuous performance gains during training. In this paper, we find that the model's limited self-teaching capability underlies this phenomenon by generating unreliable guidance on certain samples. To address this problem, we propose Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation (TESD), which enables the self-teacher to generate rollouts and receive environmental feedback based on task correctness and context independence. First, using these rewards as training objectives, we perform teacher-oriented optimization to continuously enhance the model's self-teaching capability during distillation. Second, by estimating teacher guidance reliability from these rewards, we apply adaptive student-oriented optimization to down-weight samples with unreliable guidance. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and model scales show that TESD consistently outperforms representative token-level and sequence-level methods, highlighting the necessity of improving supervision quality in OPSD.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

We wanted to solve a frustrating problem in On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD): the "self-teacher" model often gets blinded by the privileged context and gives pretty unreliable, overconfident token-level guidance, which ends up misleading the student model.

To fix this, we proposed TESD (Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation):

  1. We let the teacher evolve dynamically by optimizing it with environment feedback.
  2. We automatically down-weight those training samples where the teacher's guidance is deemed unreliable.

As a result, TESD consistently beats standard token-level distillation (like SDPO) and even sequence-level RL (like GRPO) across benchmarks like SciKnowEval and Tooluse.

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.38637
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.38637 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.38637 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.38637 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 1