Abstract
Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation improves on-policy self-distillation by continuously enhancing self-teaching reliability through reward-guided teacher optimization and adaptive down-weighting of unreliable samples.
On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), which aligns a student model's token-level distribution with that of its self-teacher prompted by privileged context, has emerged as a promising direction to mitigate reward sparsity in sequence-level post-training paradigms. However, OPSD often fails to achieve continuous performance gains during training. In this paper, we find that the model's limited self-teaching capability underlies this phenomenon by generating unreliable guidance on certain samples. To address this problem, we propose Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation (TESD), which enables the self-teacher to generate rollouts and receive environmental feedback based on task correctness and context independence. First, using these rewards as training objectives, we perform teacher-oriented optimization to continuously enhance the model's self-teaching capability during distillation. Second, by estimating teacher guidance reliability from these rewards, we apply adaptive student-oriented optimization to down-weight samples with unreliable guidance. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and model scales show that TESD consistently outperforms representative token-level and sequence-level methods, highlighting the necessity of improving supervision quality in OPSD.
Community
We wanted to solve a frustrating problem in On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD): the "self-teacher" model often gets blinded by the privileged context and gives pretty unreliable, overconfident token-level guidance, which ends up misleading the student model.
To fix this, we proposed TESD (Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation):
- We let the teacher evolve dynamically by optimizing it with environment feedback.
- We automatically down-weight those training samples where the teacher's guidance is deemed unreliable.
As a result, TESD consistently beats standard token-level distillation (like SDPO) and even sequence-level RL (like GRPO) across benchmarks like SciKnowEval and Tooluse.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- SIPO: Unifying Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Self-Distillation (2026)
- Teach Me After You Learn It: Lookahead Self-Distillation for RLVR (2026)
- Correctness-Dependent Asymmetric Target Distributions for Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (2026)
- Outcome-Guided On-Policy Self-Distillation (2026)
- Stochastic Teacher Intervention for Agentic On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- When to Follow the Teacher: Advantage-Based On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- Teach Yourself Where to Look: On-Policy Attention Self-Distillation for Reasoning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.38637 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper