# Using Wav2Vec2.0 XLSR without finetuning possible?

**URL:** </static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fusing-wav2vec2-0-xlsr-without-finetuning-possible%2F26916%3E%5C
**Category:** Beginners\
**Created:** [November 29, 2022, 6:36am UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fusing-wav2vec2-0-xlsr-without-finetuning-possible%2F26916 "2022-11-29T06:36:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jw4169](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9d8465/32.png) [@jw4169](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Fu%2Fjw4169)%5C
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 6:36am UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fusing-wav2vec2-0-xlsr-without-finetuning-possible%2F26916%2F1 "2022-11-29T06:36:41Z")

</div>

Out of curiosity, is it possible to use wav2vec2-xlsr without finetuning provided we pass in a tokenizer for the language of choice? All example of usage have been on finetuned models, and I was wondering if there was a reason for always finetuning, and if it even makes sense to use wav2vec2-xlsr without finetuning.

Thanks in advance!