# Unable to fine-tune wav2vec2

**URL:** </static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Funable-to-fine-tune-wav2vec2%2F7480%3E%5C
**Category:** Models\
**Created:** [June 28, 2021, 4:59am UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Funable-to-fine-tune-wav2vec2%2F7480 "2021-06-28T04:59:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ayushmehta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f9ae1b/32.png) [@ayushmehta](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Fu%2Fayushmehta)%5C
**Post date:** [June 28, 2021, 4:59am UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Funable-to-fine-tune-wav2vec2%2F7480%2F1 "2021-06-28T04:59:10Z")

</div>

We tried to fine tune wav2vec2 model using the google colab shared by @patrickvonplaten using our own dataset on [this google colab](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Ij_SabSpbs_EnY-yIP58aePArg1QcT3c?authuser=1#scrollTo=nOQh2uUS8IA9), we got significantly higher errors so we tried to recreate the results on timit dataset, but we still got higher errors, here is the [link to it](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1LKbXDuk7qD-t6Wx9gGkFhdN0K23_LPsj). I am not able to figure out what might be the reason for this. @patrickvonplaten could you look into this

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ayushmehta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f9ae1b/32.png) [@ayushmehta](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Fu%2Fayushmehta)%5C
**Post date:** [June 28, 2021, 4:59am UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Funable-to-fine-tune-wav2vec2%2F7480%2F2 "2021-06-28T04:59:47Z")

</div>

Here is the link to [dataset](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aGJp08I48VPXEP9lcjcwy5Mak4_Il04-?usp=sharing) that we are planning to use for fine-tuning wav2vec2.
